Exxon Valdez oil spill

The Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker, was departing from the Valdez oil terminal (on its 28th voyage) and heading south, through Prince William Sound, with a full load of oil. Captain Joseph Hazelwood[?] radioed to the Coast Guard station that he would be changing course in order to avoid some growlers, small icebergs which had drifted into the sound from the Columbia Glacier[?]. The captain received permission to move into the northbound lane. Before retiring to his cabin, Captain Hazelwood instructed his third mate Gregory Cousins to steer the vessel back into the southbound lane once it passed Busby Island. Although Cousins did give the instructions to the helmsman to steer the vessel to the right, the vessel was not turning sharply enough and at 12:04 a.m. the vessel hit Bligh Reef. It is not known whether Cousins gave the orders too late, the helmsman did not follow instructions properly, or if something was wrong with the steering system of the vessel. Journalist Greg Palast has argued that the accident was due to a corporate decision to not maintaint the ship's Raycas[?] radar off in order to save money, Palast contends that the ship had been running without radar for at least a year. About 11 million gallons of crude oil were spilled, affecting 1,900km of coastline[?].

The spill was the largest in U.S. history, and its remote location (accessible only by helicopter and boat) made government and industry response efforts difficult and tested existing plans for dealing with such an event. The region was habitat for salmon, sea otters[?], seals, and sea birds.

A trial burn was conducted during the early stages of the spill, in a region of the spill isolated from the rest by a fire-resistant boom. The test was relatively successful, but because of unfavorable weather no additional burning was attempted in this cleanup effort. Mechanical cleanup was started shortly afterward using booms and skimmers, but the skimmers were not readily available during the first 24 hours following the spill and thick oil and kelp tended to clog the equipment. Transferring oil from temporary storage vessels into more permanent containers was also difficult because of the oil's weight and thickness. In addition, a trial application of dispersants was performed. The use of dispersants proved to be controversial. Less than 4,000 gallons of dispersant were available in Valdez, Alaska, and no application equipment or aircraft. A private company applied dispersants on March 24 with a helicopter and dispersant bucket. Because there was not enough wave action to mix the dispersant with the oil in the water, their use was discontinued.

On February 27, 1990 Exxon and its shipping company were indicted on five criminal counts.

In the aftermath of the Exxon Valdez incident Congress passed the Oil Pollution Act of 1990[?], including a clause banning the Exxon Valdez from Alaskan waters. Exxon spent some 2 billion dollars cleaning up the spill with 11,000 workers, and a further 1 billion to settle civil and criminal charges related to the case(?). A lawsuit brought by fishermen, property owners, businesses and communities who claimed they were harmed by the spill is still in progress as of 2002. An award of $287 million for actual damage and $5000 million for punitive damages was awarded by an Anchorage jury in 1994. Exxon appealed the ruling and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the original judge Russel Holland[?] to reduce the amount. On December 6, 2002 the judge announced that he had reduced the damages to $4000 million, which he concluded was justified by the facts of the case and not grossly excessive. Exxon's company position is that no punitive damages are justified because the spill was an accident. However in court it was argued that allowing a "known drunk" to captain the ship was reprehensible. Exxon has said it will continue to appeal.

The tanker was towed to San Diego, arriving on July 10 and repairs began in July 30, 1989. Around 1,600 tons of steel was removed and replaced. In June 1990 the renamed SeaRiver Mediterranean left harbor after $30 million of repairs. The ship was banned from Valdez by a new regulation that prohibited vessels that had caused oil spils of more than 1 million gallons. In April 1998 the company argued in a legal action against government that the ship should be allowed back to Valdez, since the regulation was unfairly directed at Exxon alone (no other ships meet this criterion.)

The long-term effects of the oil spill have been studied. Thousands of animals perished immediately, but even as soon as a year later, one had to look carefully on most beaches to find any evidence of the spill. (Need information here on studies done of animal populations after the spill!)

On January 29, 1990 the trial of Captain Joseph Hazelwood began in Anchorage, Alaska. Then on March 13, 1991 the United States Justice Department annouced that Exxon had agreed to pay $1 billion for the clean-up of the spill (Exxon in fact would end-up spending about $2 billion dollars on the clean-up).

Exxon spent some $2 billion cleaning up the spill, most of this paid by insurance. Exxon has also paid damages of $50,000,000 from an [insurance]] fund.

According to reports from the Survivors of the Valdez Oil Spill, Exxon has earned approximately 800 million dollars a year on the money set aside to pay the damages, which as of 2001, equalled $6 billion dollars, more than enough to pay the damage award without impacting the financial standing of the company. In 1991, following the collapse of the local marine population (particularly clams, herring, and seals) the Chugach went bankrupt.