To those who accept the idea of consumerism, these products are not seen as valuable in themselves, but rather as social signals or a reducer of anxiety about belonging. The older term "conspicuous consumption" spread to describe this in the United States in the 1960s, but was soon linked to larger debates about media theory[?], culture jamming, and its corollary productivism.
Gandhi's ideal of voluntary simplicity was seen as an alternative to consumerism, and movements towards Green anarchism and eco-anarchism often focused on rejecting consumer products as such, rather than the means by which they were made (the usual focus of moral purchasing efforts or the Green parties).
These movements were difficult to separate from others that stated opposition to capitalism. Left-wing critics tended to see consumerism as a symptom of capitalism, and argued that it would not occur under socialism. Critics of these critics noted that socialist economies rarely had the capacity to produce consumer products, or figure out how to ration them fairly, and that the idolatry of symbols (like the hammer and sickle universally used to represent communism -- see photo) was merely another variant of a consumer branding exercise. This debate continues to this day as the "flag, name and label" debate, one of many views of what is called "intellectual capital".
The less controversial theory of instructional capital and social capital had a simpler explanation for consumer behavior: a known global brand name represented a known quality of service due to its consistency of production instructions and infrastructure. It also could protect this 'good name' with the emergence of global intellectual property law. Thus, the traveller or mobile individual who needed reliable service at a good price would be drawn naturally towards trusted names that represented organizations that could reliably produce identical results across many diverse cultures, e.g. McDonald's. In this view, travel and the anxiety of travel to new places had a major impact on the emergence of global brands recognized everywhere.
But some brands, e.g. Nike, were also recognized everywhere as status symbols, due to their association with major sports figures and advertising. So this conventional analysis did not obviate the need to explore consumption as such.
Debates over consumerism tend to focus on one of three important areas:
There is a vast literature on consumerism and consumer behavior, mostly by its critics. Promoters of consumerism as such are few, but certainly include those politicians who call for more shopping, more tourism, more travel, etc., as G. W. Bush did after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks had inhibited these activities.
See also: productivism, culture jamming, moral purchasing, measuring well-being, commodity markets.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|