Encyclopedia > Mongol

  Article Content

Mongols

Redirected from Mongol

The Mongols refer to an ethnic group which originated in what is now Mongolia and now is concentrated in that country, Russia, and China, particularly in Inner Mongolia. They currently number about 10 million and speak the Mongol language.

Table of contents

History

Despite being relatively few in number (approximately 200,000 people at the height of their empire), the Mongols played an important part in early world history. Rising initially under the leadership of Genghis Khan, the Mongols created the largest land empire in world history, encompassing 13.8 million square miles and more than 100 million people under their rule. At their height, they controlled most of China, Korea, Afghanistan, Georgia, Armenia, Russia, and Hungary, and all lands in between.

The People

The Mongols were a nomadic people who in the 13th century found themselves encompassed by large, city-dwelling agrarian civilizations. However, none of these civilizations were part of a strong central state. Asia, Russia, and the Middle East were either declining kingdoms, or composed of city states. Taking the strategic initiative, the Mongols exploited this power vacuum and linked all of these areas into a mutually supporting trade network. The Mongols were completely dependent on trade with the city dwelling peoples. As nomads, they could not accumulate a surplus to tide themselves over during bad times, or support artisans to produce technological goods. The beginning of conquest, in 1200, was due to the fact that the kingdom that controlled northern China reduced trade with the Mongols. They attacked to survive.

Conquering, in the Khan's initial viewpoint, did not consist of subordination of competing cultures to the nomadic way of life, but rather in their destruction. As a nomad, Genghis Khan is supposed to not have understood (or cared) of the supposed benefits in the city dwellers way of life. This is in sharp contrast to the obvious reality of their dependence on trade with these people, however the economic theories to explain these relationships still lay seven centuries in the future. The Khan's initial plan was said to have consisted of destroying conquered opponents territory, destroying all traces of their civilization, and converting the lands to pasture for his herds. However, Sorghaghtani Beki (see Philosophy of Empire, below) pointed out a previously unseen advantage to keeping the status quo. If the city dwelling peoples were allowed to continue their way of life (strange as it may have seemed to the Khan), they could produce a surplus of food and goods, a portion of which could be paid to the Khan as taxes. Given the Khan's extraordinary success in his aggressive foreign policy, this wealth could be equally extraordinary. After some thought, the Khan agreed, taking his tribute in tax, and saving countless lives and cultures in the process.

Genghis Khan in particular, never had any intention of creating a world empire. Each of his conquests was started by a specific dispute over the developing trade network (the treatment of Mongols or Mongol merchants, or disadvantageous terms for trade). One such example is the capture of Yanjing[?] (literally, the north capital, in Chinese) in 1215. He refused to exploit the capture of the capital of all of northern China, a real prize. After his success, he simply returned home to the steppe. The same pattern was repeated throughout the conquest of Western Asia, taken at a breakneck pace over only 6 years. It was a simple formula, conquer the resistance, establish advantageous trade terms, and return. The hidden benefit of this reluctance was to avoid the trap that all civilizations have made in trying to create a large empire on purpose. Simply put, rapid expansion leads to overextension of the empire, and the inability to support outlying districts from invasion. Ancient Rome is a prime example of this problem.

Military Innovation

The western expansion was a success for the empire until 1242. As they encountered the peoples of Europe, the Mongols with their advanced way of warfare were unstoppable. The Mongols used (and by doing so, introduced) several revolutionary military ideas to European combatants, their most serious opponents by the end of their period of expansion.

  • Use of articulation. In this, they used a system of horns and flags, blown or raised-and-lowered by the field commander. This allowed them to move their troops to preplanned positions on the field of battle, or modes of attack or retreat (such as charge, withdraw, or flank). In addition, they utilized subcommanders that were empowered to make decisions on the spot.

  • Mongols based their forces almost wholly on light cavalry. Light cavalry consists of primarily archers and light swordsman mounted on horseback. Mobile and numerous, light cavalry can give combat when it chooses, or easily retreat out of range when the enemy heavy cavalry gets too close. Heavy cavalry lacks archers (who can kill at range) and is designed mainly to provide shock - using weight, speed, and fear of their massed movement (no one wants to be trampled to death) to break enemy heavy infantry lines. Thus, when light cavalry meets heavy cavalry, the lighter, more numerous, faster moving, bow using, well-articulated light cavalry will usually defeat mounted knights - the cream of European military power.

  • Their conception of armor was markedly different. In contrast to European knights, who utilized plate armour (sheets of loops of chain and pieces of metal plate to protect the wearer, restricting his vision and movement), Mongols utilized silken cloths around their bodies. The silk cloth allowed Mongol warriors greater movement, vision, endurance, and resistance to ranged weapons, providing them a qualitative advantage over their opponents. If a soldier was struck with an arrow, it penetrates the skin and sinks into the flesh but the silk is not penetrated but is pulled into the wound. Mongol doctor could easily pull the arrow from the wound wrapped in silken cloth, this reduced the chance of infection and made cleaning and dressing the wound easier, hopefully returning the skilled warrior to combat in time. This simple procedure saved many lives. In a prolonged conflict, the Mongols would tend to retain more valued battlefield veterans than their opponents. This usually resulted in a situation where an army of veteran Mongols faced a conscript peasant army, with disastrous results for the Mongols opponent.

  • They utilized an operational concept (known as operative art) never before seen. As nomads, the Mongols carried all of their wealth and provisions with them on horseback. It was, for all relevant purposes, equivalent of placing an entire city on horseback. It was more mobile than many of their opponents armed forces, who were tied to the towns for their logistics. Since their way of warfare was superior (articulated veteran light cavalry) they could not be bested in combat. The traditional solution to this problem is to attack the opponents logistics (food, fields, water, etc). However, their city-dwelling opponents were tied to their logistics, not the Mongols. This operational concept ensured their quick victory against any foe throughout their history. The closest modern analogue exists in the modern aircraft carrier, with its ability to bring an entire city of warriors next door to an opponent on short notice, strike at them from a great range, and retreat away, unable to be pursued.

  • They used political terror systematically as a psychological weapon. The Mongols would provide an opportunity to surrender on usually favourable (certainly to the Mongolís) terms. These were typically dictated to the first major population center in a new territory, although there are exceptions. When refused, they would sack the city, execute the entire population (save a handful of skilled workers), and burn the city and the surrounding fields to the ground. In addition, they would often construct an edifice of cleaned skulls outside the walls of the destroyed city to serve as a reminder of their passage. They would then allow a few survivors to flee, in order to spread terror throughout the countryside. By first offering favourable (or at least acceptable) terms for surrender, and then invariably completely destroying any resistance, it is argued that Mongols forestalled most combat with invaded peoples. The Mongols quickly developed a reputation of being unstoppable, genocidal opponents. After the initial victories, and proof of the Mongols good intentions, it became more difficult for rulers to convince their people to resist an invasion. This use of terror is certainly to credit for the unprecedented speed with which Mongol armies spread across western Asia and eastern Europe.

Philosophy of Empire

The most famous Mongol in the 13th century (much more so than Genghis Khan himself) was Kublai Khan's mother, and Genghis Khan's daughter-in-law, Sorghaghtani Beki[?]. She is mentioned by numerous and far flung contemporary 13th century writers, such as the Persians, European missionaries, and Arab scholars as the most renowned of all Mongols. A Middle Eastern physician commented, "if I were to see among the race of women another who is so remarkable a woman as this, I would say that the race of women is superior to the race of men", quite a complement from a individual in a culture well known for its misogynistic view of women in the 13th century.

Beki's greatest single feat was to recognize the serious problems the Mongols would encounter in running a transcontinental empire. Although illiterate herself, as she groomed each of her four sons (all to become Khans) for rule, she made certain each would learn a different foreign language used in ruling their subject peoples. In addition, she educated court retainers and nobles in the religions of each subject people and sent them to become members of the clergy in each region. Religious tolerance was mandated by law, (unheard of in the ancient world, and many areas of the world today), and all religions were equally supported throughout the empire. This eliminated a source of conflict around which resistance to Mongol rule could be based.

Her greatest contribution to Mongol rule was that she recognized that pure economic exploitation of subject peoples would be counterproductive. Thus, instead of remaking China into a Mongol pasture, she supported existing Chinese society. The increased production realized by enlightened Mongol rule would lead to increased tax and tribute. Each of her sons followed the same philosophy, ensuring continuity and stability. Tolerance, religious and economic support, and literacy were the innovations that took a small nomad people to rulers of all they surveyed.

Timeline of Conquest

The Mongols attempted two unsuccessful invasions of Japan. The first invasion fleet was utterly destroyed by a typhoon (kamikaze). The Mongolian fleets survived the typhoon the second time but the landed troops, starved because their provisions had been lost in the typhoon, were annihilated by Japanese infantry and samurai.

  • 1200, Northern China - Unknown number killed
  • 1215, Yanjing China - Unknown number killed
  • 1221, Nishapur[?], Persia - ~1.7 million killed in assault
  • 1221, Merv, Persia - ~ 1.3 million killed in assault
  • 1221, Meru Chahjan[?], Persia - ~ 1.3 million killed in assault
  • 1221, Rayy[?], Persia - ~ 1.6 million killed in assault
  • 1226, Tangut Campaign - Gengis Khan launches war against the northern China people of Tangut.
  • 1258, Baghdad - ~ 800,000 people. Results in destruction of Abbasid dynasty
  • 1226 - 1266 (re-check dates) - ~ 18 million reported killed in conquest of northern Chinese territory. This number estimated by Kublai Khan himself.

(This is *very* incomplete, I just carried work over from the previous write up & added a few things)



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
Kolmogorov axiom

... spaces by letting an example of the structure on X be simply a metric on KQ(X). This is a sensible structure on X; it is a pseudometric. (Again, there is a more direct ...