Plants of the family Fabaceae, for instance, have nodules on their roots which contain nitrogen-fixing bacteria. It therefore makes good sense agriculturally to alternate them with Poaceae and other plants that need nitrogen. It also makes good nutritional sense to grow beans and grain at the same time in different fields.
Some plants follow one another favorably and others don't. To let these last ones follow each other set risks of yield losses, development of diseases and weeds.
The choice of the rotation depends on the nature of the soil, which determines the species of plants that one can cultivate, but also on animal breeding, which plays a role in the choice of the rotation (fodder crops, straw). Finally a good rotation takes into account the proportion of natural meadows.
The choice of the rotation is also determined by the economical aspects (local needs, market accessibility).
Crop rotation was already mentioned in the Roman literature, and referred to by great civilizations (in Africa and Asia).
From the end of the Middle Ages until the 20th century, the three-year rotation was practised by farmers with a rotation: rye or winter wheat, followed by spring oats or barley, then letting the soil rest (fallow) during the third stage. The fact that suitable rotations made it possible to restore or to maintain the balance of the soil was very well recognised.
A Four field rotation was pioneered by the Dutch and popularised by the British agriculturalist Charles Townshend[?] in the 18th century. The system (wheat, barley, turnips and clover), opened up a fodder crop and grazing crop allowing livestock to be bred year-round. The four field rotation was a key development in the agricultural revolution.