Encyclopedia > Bayes' theorem

  Article Content

Bayes' theorem

Bayes' theorem is a result in probability theory, named after the Reverend Thomas Bayes, who proved a special case of it in the 18th century. It is used in statistical inference to update estimates of the probability that different hypotheses are true, based on observations and a knowledge of how likely those observations are, given each hypothesis. Its discrete version may appear to go little beyond an identity that is sometimes taken to be the definition of conditional probability, but there is also a continuous version. A frequent error is to think that reliance on Bayes' theorem is the essence of Bayesianism, whose essence is actually the degree-of-belief interpretation of probability, contrasted with various "frequency" interpretations.

We will start with the simplest case of only two hypotheses, H1 and H2. Suppose that we know that precisely one of the two hypotheses must be true, and suppose furthermore that we know their "prior" probabilities P(H1) and P(H2) = 1 - P(H1). Now some "data" D is observed, and we know the conditional probabilities of D given H1 and H2, written as P(D | H1) and P(D | H2). We want to compute the "posterior" probabilities of H1 and H2, given the observation of D. Bayes' theorem states that these probabilities can be computed as

<math> P(H_1 | D) = c \cdot P(H_1) \cdot P(D | H_1) </math>
<math> P(H_2 | D) = c \cdot P(H_2) \cdot P(D | H_2) </math>
where the constant c has to be chosen so that the sum of the two probabilities is 1, i.e.
<math> c = \frac{1}{P(H_1) \cdot P(D | H_1) + P(H_2) \cdot P(D | H_2)} </math>
This theorem is a simple consequence of the definition of conditional probabilities.

To illustrate, suppose there are two bowls full of cookies. Bowl #1 has 10 chocolate chip and 30 plain cookies, while bowl #2 has 20 of each. Somebody randomly picks a bowl, and then randomly picks a cookie. The cookie turns out to be a plain one. How likely is it that he picked it out of bowl #1?

Intuitively, it seems clear that the answer should be more than 50%, since there are more plain cookies in bowl #1. The precise answer is given by Bayes' theorem. H1 corresponds to bowl #1, and H2 to bowl #2. Since the bowl was picked randomly, we know P(H1) = P(H2) = 50%. The "data" D consists in the observation of a plain cookie. From the contents of the bowls, we know that P(D | H1) = 75% and P(D | H2) = 50%. Bayes' formula then yields

<math>
\begin{matrix} P(H_1 | D) &=& \frac{P(H_1) \cdot P(D | H_1)}{P(H_1) \cdot P(D | H_1) + P(H_2) \cdot P(D | H_2)} \\ \\ \ & =& \frac{50% \cdot 75%}{50% \cdot 75% + 50% \cdot 50%} \\ \\ \ & =& 60% \end{matrix} </math> Initially, we estimated that he would pick bowl #1 with 50% probability, but after observing the plain cookie, we adjust our estimate to 60%.

The theorem is also true if we have more than just two hypotheses, say H1, H2, H3, ..., of which precisely one is true. Suppose we know the prior probability distribution

(P(H1), P(H2), P(H3), ...)
as well as the likelihood function
(P(D|H1), P(D|H2), P(D|H3), ...)
Then the posterior probability distribution
(P(H1 |D), P(H2 |D), P(H3 |D), ...)
can be found by multiplying the prior probability distribution by the likelihood function and then normalizing, so that we have
(P(D|H1), P(D|H2), P(D|H3), ...)
= c × ((P(H1) P(D|H1), P(H2) P(D|H2), P(H3) P(D|H3), ...).
Here again the constant c must be so chosen as to make the sum of the posterior probabilities equal to 1.

The continuous case of Bayes' theorem also says the posterior distribution results from multiplying the prior by the likelihood and then normalizing. The prior and posterior distributions are usually identified with their probability density functions.

For example, suppose the proportion of voters who will vote "yes" is an unknown number p between 0 and 1. A sample of n voters is drawn randomly from the population, and it is observed that x of those n voters will vote "yes". The likelihood function is then

L(p) = [constant] px (1-p)n-x.
Multiplying that by the prior probability density funtion of p and then normalizing gives the posterior probability distribution of p, and thus updates probabilities in light of the new data given by the opinion poll. Thus if the prior probability distribution of p is uniform on the interval [0,1], then the posterior probability distribution would have a density of the form
f(p|x) = [constant] px (1-p)n-x
and this "constant" would be different from the one that appears in the likelihood function.

Bayesianism is the philosophical tenet that the rules of mathematical probability apply not only when probabilities are relative frequencies assigned to random events, but also when they are degrees of belief assigned to uncertain propositions. Updating these degrees of belief in light of new evidence almost invariably involves application of Bayes' theorem.

See also :



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
Bullying

... it did not always have inherently negative implications, it merely designated anyone who assumed power for any period of time without a legitimate basis of ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 23.4 ms