In the sequel, we will give a general treatment of universal properties. It is advisable to study several examples first: product of groups and direct sum, free group, product topology, Stone-Čech compactification, tensor product, inverse limit and direct limit, kernel and cokernel[?], pullback[?], pushout[?] and equalizer[?].
Let C and D be categories, F : C -> D be a functor, and X an object of D. A universal morphism from F to X consists of an object AX of C and a morphism φX : F(AX) -> X in D, such that the following universal property is satisfied:
The existence of the morphism ψ intuitively expresses the fact that AX is "large enough" or "general enough", while the uniqueness of the morphism ensures that AX is "not too large".
From the definition, it follows directly that the pair (AX, φX) is determined up to a unique isomorphism by X, in the following sense: if A'X is another object of C and φ'X : F(A'X) -> X is another morphism which has the universal property, then there exists a unique isomorphism f : AX -> A'X such that φ'X f = φX.
More generally, if φX1 : F(AX1) -> X1 and φX2 : F(AX2) -> X2 are two universal morphisms, and h : X1 -> X2 is a morphism in D, then there exists a unique morphism Ah: AX1 -> AX2 such that φX2 F(Ah) = φX1.
Therefore, if every object X of D admits a universal arrow, then the assignment X |-> AX and h |-> Ah defines a covariant functor from D to C, the right-adjoint of F.
The dual concept of a co-universal construction also exists: it assigns to every object X of D an object BX of C and a morphism ρX: X -> F(BX) in D, such that the following universal property is satisfied:
It is important to realize that not every functor F has a right-adjoint or a left adjoint; in other words: while one may always write down a universal property defining an object AX, that does not mean that such an object also exists.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|