Such systems have evolved in both the United States and the United Kingdom, as well as Australia (at least in the lower house of Parliament). While Americans and citizens of the UK often see the two-party system as natural, based on their long experiences with it, it is in fact an artifact of the particular rules in place. The two parties that dominate thus have an incentive to keep the rules as they are, so as to prevent electoral losses to smaller parties.
Defenders of the two-party system claim that it is a more stable system. Because uncommon ideas are non-influential, policies and governments do not change rapidly. The system allows major parties to co-opt uncommon ideas as they become more common. While smaller parties find this exceptionally frustrating, it enhances stability while allowing for ideas that gain favor to become politically influential.
Critics of the two-party system point out that stability may not be an advantage, since there are many stable democratic republics, such as Germany, that have some form of proportional representation. They argue that it leads to the following flaws:
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|