Encyclopedia > Talk:Fundamental force

  Article Content

Talk:Fundamental force

"Fundamental force" -- wasn't that that old TV series with Mr. T? :-)

Which is the most correct term - '... interaction' or '... nuclear force'. 'Interaction' kind of implies a particle physics way of thinking. Just this needs to be agreed as someone has written a weak nuclear force article which covers the same as the weak interaction stuff. -- Na

Good point - I have a somewhat limited grasp of the nuclear weak force/weak interaction, but I felt that a bit of a stub might interest others in adding to it. (and if not, I've been doing a bit of reading on the subject, and figured I'd fix it up once I had my facts in order) The reason I ended up on weak nuclear force were twofold: 1 - that is the way I had always heard of it and 2 - the page that inspired me to create the entry was theory of everything and the author(s) used strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force so I carried through. Come to think of it, I only stumbled on Theory of Everything - I had always thought it would be grand unification theory. -- DS

Add to Fundamental force a comment on "electroweak force"?

I had to modify the description of gravity to include the finite velocity of propagation of gravity. As the article stood, if the universe were infinite, we would have been saying that gravity propagates instantly. AstroNomer 18:41 Aug 20, 2002 (PDT)

Should this be merged with fundamental forces? --Ellmist Saturday, August 31st, 2002

I say yes -- with the plural redirecting here. --mav

Yup. AxelBoldt 07:49 Aug 31, 2002 (PDT)

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
  Featured Article

... University[?] Lee College Lubbock Christian University[?] McMurry University[?] Midwestern State University[?] Northwood University[?] Our Lady of ...