Someone who (a) knows and (b) cares about Chinese culture, literature, religion, and history should work this over. This is apologetic literature for the practice of a religion which the article admits dates only (in its "traditional" form) to the 1970s (when it "reemerged").
MichaelTinkler
The rationale for redirecting this to "Chinese Qigong" escapes me. There's nothing here to disambiguate, and the practice is always commonly referred to with only the single word. Eclecticology
based on Chinese religion
strikes me as odd, since that includes several different religions that have very little in common. Can you be more specific?
Mkweise
All Wikipedia text
is available under the
terms of the GNU Free Documentation License