Is there any reason not to make this a redirect to
Great Britain?
- not as far as I can see Tarquin
- shouldn't it be a redirect to Britain? or maybe United Kingdom, since it's mostly used for citizens of that country?
Look at the
links for this page (
/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=British) the vast majority of them are using British to indicate a citizen of the UK. I think this page should be redirected to
United Kingdom instead of
Great Britain Mintguy 03:35 Dec 20, 2002 (UTC)
- Agreed. Done. -- Tarquin
- I disagree - I just cannot stand to see the UK and Britain conflated. It's probably true that the majority of links to British refer to a UK citizen - that's probably because someone who is British is necessarily a UK citizen. There's nothing wrong with that - they're British too. But what happens when somebody says that George I was a British king, and clicking on British takes us to United Kingdom, which didn't exist at that time? I mean, why should somebody who makes a link to British want it to go to United Kingdom? Honestly, this change seems very bizarre to me. I'm changing it back so the redirect goes to Great Britain - if people are making links incorrectly, it's the links that need to be changed, not this redirect. --Camembert
- The article on Great Britain describes the island of Great Britain. The article that describes the state that was Great Britain resides at United Kingdom, for goodness sake look at the links to this page. This page should redirect to United Kingdom. Mintguy 13:59 Dec 28, 2002 (UTC)
- I have looked at the links page, but I don't see why that means we should pretend that "British" means "of the United Kingdom", which is very clearly does not. I repeat from above: if people are making links incorrectly, it's the links that need to be changed, not this redirect. And I paraphrase myself from below: what's wrong with saying somebody is British and having the link go to Great Britain? --Camembert
My Red Dice, look at the links to this page. There's no need to disambiguate.
Mintguy
- Sorry, didn't see this discussion page (wasn't expecting to see one on a redirect page, duh) - reverted now. -MRD
I've just realised I've taken both positions up there. My, that makes me look flighty! Given that many, many writers (from all over the word, including the Brits) will misues this word, maybe we should have this page as a disambiguation, that briefly explains what "British" SHOULD actually be used for. -- Tarquin 13:35 Dec 28, 2002 (UTC)
- Maybe, though I don't begrudge the person who'll have to fix all the links pointing here! And really, is it such a big problem? Saying that Michael Caine, for example, is British, and linking it to Great Britain (which is the sort of thing links pointing here do) isn't a misuse of "British" or a bad link, after all (I mean, he is from Great Britain). Saying somebody from Ireland is British would be bad, of course, but nobody seems to be doing that. So I guess I don't really see the problem with things as they now are. Maybe United Kingdom could be mentioned and linked a bit more prominently in the Great Britain article though (like in the first paragraph) - that might be an improvement. --Camembert
- This is an interminable discussion: one round finishes and the redirection is set up in such a way, then a few months later someone will reopen the issue by changing it to how they think it should be. Personally I think British should redirect to Britain, since the two words are related. See Talk:Britain. See also America for how the issue is handled there.
- Well, Britain redirects to Great Britain, so the current set up is how you suggest. --Camembert
- It's not too bad, but Britain/British often refer to the UK, so making Britain a stub is logical.
- The situation is now ludicrous. British redirects to Great Britain which is about the island and is completely wrong for the majority of the links. Mintguy
- Why is it "completely wrong for the majority of the links"? As far as I can see, the majority (indeed, all) of the links are referring to something of the island (they're referring to something of the country as well, of course, but that doesn't make a link to the island wrong, does it?). --Camembert
Ok here's an example... Duke of Wellington? British? Yes of Course. Only he was born in Ireland. One more what about History of Guernsey - "The islands were the only British soil occupied by German troops in World War II" - Only Guernsy isn't Great Britain or even the British Isles as such. Mintguy
- As I've already said twice - if people are making links incorrectly, it's the links that need to be changed, not this redirect. And here's a counter example - people prior to 1801 might be described as "British" quite accurately - but making a link from them to "United Kingdom" wouldn't make much sense, because the UK didn't exist at that time. --Camembert
- Well you would want to link such articles to United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland perhaps? Mintguy
- If the article was relevant to that time frame (which my example was not - I said prior to 1801, while that state was in existence between 1801 and the 1920s), then maybe. I don't want to get involved with that, though - my main point is simply that "British" means "of Britain" and so should redirect to Great Britain. --Camembert
Perhaps a dictionary or two will help here:
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913
British \Brit"ish\, n. pl.
People of Great Britain.
British \Brit"ish\ (br[i^]t"[i^]sh), a. [AS. Brittisc,
Bryttisc.]
Of or pertaining to Great Britain or to its inhabitants; --
sometimes restricted to the original inhabitants.
WordNet (r) 1.7
British
adj : of or relating to or characteristic of Great Britain or its
people or culture; "his wife is British" [syn: British]
n : the people of Great Britain [syn: British, British people,
the British, Brits]
I vote for Great Britain. This is what comes to mind for me. --mav 14:19 Dec 28, 2002 (UTC)
- No disrepsect Mav, but for most Americans Britain/UK/England are synonymous, so your opinion on this hold little weight with me. Mintguy
- Oh yeah, I forgot I am just a stupid American whose opinion doesn't matter at all. Thanks for reminding me. --mav
- I'm sorry. As I said no disrespect intended. It's a generalisation but one which I encountered many times myself when working in the US.Mintguy
- I've always thought of my fellow Wikipedians as some of the smartest people from their respective countries. Your statement, however, indicates that you don't share this view. --mav
- I'm digging myself a hole here which is not something I was planning to do so I'll try to make my statement clearer. I do not think Americans are dumb, and I do not think that you are dumb and I do not think that Wikipedians in general are dumb. I was just pointing out that for a number of Americans (and in my limited experience) the difference between Britain, the British Isles, the United Kingdom, and England isn't clear as it might be to a native. Just as the difference between Kansas and Arkansas (or any other ambiguity for which I am unqualified to speak upon) might be to a native of my country. Mintguy
- OK I'm sorry for being so defensive. --mav
- Mintguy - I too am troubled by people who make no distinction between Britain and the UK - that's why it troubles me so much that you seem to be advocating that very lack of distinction. "Britain", as the above cited dictionaries say, means "of Great Britain". It doesn't mean "of the UK" (and I just checked a couple of British dictionaries which say the same thing, if that convinces you any further). In my view, the redirect should reflect this. --Camembert
- Same as America -> United States then, not? Where would somebody want to go if they clicked on a British link? Probably to United Kingdom. But I think it would be no problem to send them to a Britain page that explains the various usages, since they are still only one click away from UK.
- Yes, I can see your point there - I think the best way to deal with it, though, it to make the link to United Kingdom on the Great Britain page more prominent - that way, people who want the UK are still only a click away, and they (and everybody else) also gets some useful information without any extra clicks. I wouldn't object to a disambig page at Britain, it just seems to me that this is a more graceful way of acheiving the same thing. --Camembert
- Please don't make a disambiguation block. Just state that the UK is located on the Island on the first line. --mav
- Oh yes, that's what I meant. And that, indeed, is what I've just done :) --Camembert
Well I just looked at French and German and they disambiguate, so maybe the disambiguation for British should be there after all. I don't agree bu the precendent for disambiguation seems to already exist. Mintguy
- French and German are also languages in addition to nationalities (two fairly different things). British is an adjective or noun that refers to a geographic location. I would support disambiguation at British only if this word is also used to refer to people/things in the British Isles often enough to cause an ambiguity issue. If that is the case then perhaps an disambiguation article like American or virus is in order (then it wouldn't really be necessary to fix all the links). --mav
- The precedent exists because French and German might mean the language as well as something of the countries. This isn't such an issue with "British" because the language is called "English" (which is indeed a disambiguation page). It's true that there's a distinction to be made twixt "British English" and "American English", but I think that's such an unusual use of the word "British" that it doesn't need disambiguating against - people will be careful enough to link it to British English directly, I should think. --Camembert
I have reverted the page to Martin's disambiguation page of 25 Dec 2002. This is because the term is ambiguous. Is any other reason required to make a disambiguation page? When applied to living people, the term almost always refers to their nationality. My nationality is "British"; this means "of the United Kingdom", not "of Britain". However, in a historical context, especially when talking about times before there even was a United Kingdom, it often just means the island of Great Britain. -- Oliver P. 02:31 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Oh, I see... Britain is now a page which explains the differences in usage. Hmm, I'm not sure about this, though. "British" is the standard term for someone from the United Kingdom, and is not only used by people who call the United Kingdom "Britain". I think this page should probably contain a brief explanation of this, but I'm off to bed, so I'll leave it to somebody else... -- Oliver P. 02:38 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)
All Wikipedia text
is available under the
terms of the GNU Free Documentation License