Talk:Aegean Macedonia

HISTORY and GEOGRAPHY VANDALISM !!! an rosenzweig:Das kann nicht war sein dass die griechen nach "TITONAMEN" richten sollen ! SIEHE "AEGAEAN MACEDONIA". population:2.500.000 ? WAS SIND DIE 2.500.000 MENSCHEN? SIND NICHT MAKEDONIER ? ODER WOLLEN SIE NOCH BEHAUPTEN DIE SLAWISCHE BEVÖLKERUNG SIND DIE MAKEDONIER ? ist es die ganze Objektivität VON WIKIPEDIA ? IST ES NICHT WAR MIT DEM LANGUAGE STATUS ? und,und und .

MAKEDON,thessaloniki. 62.47.22.6 27.04.2003

This is google's translation: Tuf-Kat

HISTORY and GEOGRAPHY VANDALISM!!! on rosenzweig:Das cannot was to be that the Greeks after "TITONAMEN" to arrange be supposed! SEE "AEGAEAN MACEDONIA". population:2.500.000? WHAT ARE 2,500,000 HUMANS? AREN'T MACEDONIANS? OR WOOLS IT STILL STATING THE SLAWI POPULATION ARE THE MACEDONIANS? is it the whole objectivity OF WIKIPEDIA? ISN'T IT WAS WITH THE LANGUAGE STATUS? and, and and.

Danke TUF-KAT ! MAKEDON,thessaloniki.

Don't thank me too much. This translation doesn't make sense. Tuf-Kat

My translation: John Owens

HISTORY and GEOGRAPHY VANDALISM !!! to Rosenzweig: That can not be true that the greeks should correct "Tito's naming" ! SEE "AEGEAN MACEDONIA". population:2,500,000 ? WHAT ARE THE 2,500,000 PEOPLE ? AREN'T THEY MACEDONIANS ? OR DO YOU STILL WANT TO STATE THAT THE SLAVIC POPULATION ARE THE MACEDONIANS ? is it the entire objectivity OF WIKIPEDIA ? ISN'T IT TRUE WITH THE LANGUAGE STATUS ? and,and and .

Not much better. -- John Owens

Not too much bad - only the first sentence need to be different, as "richten" not only means "to correct", but also "to follow". Thus here is my version - a native german speaker, but then maybe not 100% english :-)

to rosenzweig: It cannot be true that the greek should follow the "Tito naming"! SEE "AEGAEAN MACEDONIA". population:2.500.000 ? WHAT ARE THE 2.500.000 HUMANS? ARE NOT MAKEDONIANS (yes, german grammar is broken here) ? OR DO YOU WANT TO GO AS FAR AND STATE THAT THE SLAWIC POPULATION ARE MAKEDONIANS? is that the whole WIKIPEDIA objectivity? IT IS NOT TRUE WITH THE LANGUAGE STATUS?

andy 13:24 May 14, 2003 (UTC)

Yeah, I kind of figured "war" was supposed to be "wahr", but it's funnier my way. ;) -- John Owens 06:24 23 May 2003 (UTC)

Oops! I did use the "true" translation myself, I guess I meant it's funnier Tuf-Kat's/Google's way. -- John Owens 06:27 23 May 2003 (UTC)

Now, as for the two anons, if things don't cool down in a form that looks like passable English soon, I'm going to protect the page and let you slug it out here until a reasonable compromise is reached, at which time I would unprotect it. -- John Owens 07:41 May 2, 2003 (UTC)