In the case of the Soviet Union, a no first use pledge was seen as a means of undermining support for the United States particularly among Europeans on whose territory a nuclear war would be fought.
In the case of China, the limited number and accuracy of its nuclear arsenal rendered it suicidal for any doctrine other than assured destruction and hence it has pledged no first use against other countries. However, it is somewhat unclear if the pledge applies to a conflict involving Taiwan especially in the event of involvement by the United States.
After the end of the Cold War, Russia has continued to pledge no first use in large part because the Russian economy does not allow for the expansion of its nuclear arsenal to serve as anything other than a deterent force. Despite the fact that a Soviet invasion of Western Europe is no longer likely, the United States has stated that it reserves the right to respond to an attack by weapons of mass destruction with nuclear weapons, and a leaked Pentagon report in March 2002 purports to show that the use of nuclear weapons for other uses (such as destroying deep bunkers) is being considered.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|