The advantage of this technique is that short block switching can be done separately for every PQF band. So high frequencies can be encoded using a short block to enhance temporal resolution, low frequencies can be still encoded with high spectral resolution. However, due to aliasing between the 4 PQF bands coding efficencies around (1,2,3) * fs/8 is worse than normal MPEG-4 AAC.
MPEG-4 AAC-SSR is very similar to ATRAC and ATRAC-3[?].
The idea behind AAC-SSR was not only the advantage listed above, but also the possibility of reducing the data rate by removing 1, 2 or 3 of the upper PQF bands. A very simple bitstream splitter can remove these bands and thus reduce the bitrate and sample rate.
Example:
4 subbands: bitrate = 128 kbps, sample rate = 48 kHz, f_lowpass = 20 kHz 3 subbands: bitrate ~ 120 kbps, sample rate = 48 kHz, f_lowpass = 18 kHz 2 subbands: bitrate ~ 100 kbps, sample rate = 24 kHz, f_lowpass = 12 kHz 1 subband: bitrate ~ 65 kbps, sample rate = 12 kHz, f_lowpass = 6 kHz
Note: although possible, the resulting quality is much worse than typical for this bitrate. So for normal 64 kbps AAC a bandwidth of 14...16 kHz is achieved by using intensity stereo and reduced NMRs. This degrades audible quality less than transmitting 6 kHz bandwidth with perfect quality.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|