  ## Encyclopedia > Irrational number

Article Content

# Irrational number

In mathematics, an irrational number is any real number that is not a rational number, i.e., that cannot be written as a fraction a / b with a and b integers and b not zero. The irrational numbers are precisely those numbers whose decimal expansion never ends and never enters a periodic pattern. "Almost all" real numbers are irrational, in a sense which is defined more precisely below.

There are two types of irrational numbers, the algebraic ones such as 21/2 (the square root of two) and 31/3 (the cube root of 3), and the transcendental numbers such as π and e.

### Irrationality of certain logarithms

Perhaps the numbers most easily proved to be irrational are logarithms like log23. The argument by reductio ad absurdum is as follows:

• Suppose log23 is rational. Then for some positive integers m and n, we have log23 = m/n.
• Consequently 2m/n = 3.
• So 2m = 3n.
• But 2m is even and 3n is odd, so that is impossible.

### Irrationality of the square root of 2

The discovery of irrational number is usually attributed attributed to Pythagoras or one of his followers, who produced a (most likely geometrical) proof of the irrationality of the square root of 2.

One proof of this irrationality is the following reductio ad absurdum.

1. Assume that 21/2 is a rational number.
2. Then 21/2 can be written as an irreducible fraction a / b such that a and b are coprime integers and (a / b)2 = 2.
3. It follows that a2 / b2 = 2 and a2 = 2 b2.
4. Therefore a2 is even.
5. It follows that a must be even. (Odd numbers have odd squares.)
6. Therefore a2 is divisible by 4.
7. So a2 / 2 is even.
8. From (3) it follows that a2 / 2 = b2.
9. From (7) and (8) it follows that b2 is even.
10. It follows that b must be even.
11. By (5) and (10) a and b are both even, which contradicts that a / b is irreducible as stated in (2).
12. Since we have found a contradiction the assumption (1) that 21/2 is a rational number must be false.

This proof can be generalized to show that any root of any natural number is either a natural number or irrational.

Another reductio ad absurdum showing that √2 is irrational is less well-known and has sufficient charm that it is worth including here. It proceeds by observing that if √2=m/n then √2=(2n-m)/(m-n), so that a fraction in lowest terms is reduced to yet lower terms. That is a contradiction if n and m are positive integers, so the assumption that √2 is rational must be false. It is possible to construct from an isosceles right triangle whose leg and hypotenuse have respective lengths n and m, by a classic straightedge-and-compass construction, a smaller isosceles right triangle whose leg and hypotenuse have respective lengths m-n and 2n-m. That construction proves the irrationality of √2 by the kind of method that was employed by ancient Greek geometers.

### Other irrational numbers

All transcendental numbers are irrational, and the article on transcendental numbers lists several examples. er is irrational if r ≠ 0 is rational; πn is irrational for positive integers n.

Another way to construct irrational numbers is as zeros of polynomials: start with a polynomial equation

p(x) = an xn + an-1 xn-1 + ... + a1 x + a0 = 0
where the coefficients ai are integers. Suppose you know that there exists some real number x with p(x) = 0 (for instance because of the intermediate value theorem). The only possible rational roots of this polynomial equation are of the form r/s where r is a divisor of a0 and s is a divisor of an; there are only finitely many such candidates which you can all check by hand. If neither of them is a root of p, then x must be irrational. For example, this technique can be used to show that x = (21/2 + 1)1/3 is irrational: we have (x3 - 1)2 = 2 and hence x6 - 2x3 -1 = 0, and this latter polynomial doesn't have any rational roots (the only candidates to check are ±1).

Because the algebraic numbers form a field, many irrational numbers can be constructed by combining transcendental and algebraic numbers. For example 3π+2, π + √2 and e√3 are irrational (and even transcendental).

### Numbers not known to be irrational

It is not known whether π + e or π - e are irrational or not. In fact, there is no pair of non-zero integers m and n for which it is known whether mπ + ne is irrational or not. It is not known whether 2e, πe, π√2 or the Euler-Mascheroni gamma constant γ are irrational.

### The set of all irrational numbers

The set of all irrational numbers is uncountable (since the rationals are countable and the reals are uncountable). Using the absolute value to measure distances, the irrational numbers become a metric space which is not complete. However, this metric space is homeomorphic to the complete metric space of all sequences of positive integers; the homeomorphism is given by the infinite continued fraction expansion. This shows that the Baire category theorem applies to the space of irrational numbers.

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

Search Encyclopedia
 Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!

Featured Article
 Satire ... example, if a guy says his important subjects in school include Calculus, Computer Science, Physics, and girl-watching, he has managed to take away some of the importance ...  