Redirected from Infinite Monkey Theorem
(The word "dactylographic" appears in the English translation of Borel's book, and seems to be an Anglicization of a French word for typewriting, but in English, "dactylography" means the study of fingerprints.)
An incorrect usage prevailing among some non-mathematicians refers to "infinite monkeys" where "infinitely many monkeys" would be correct usage. Each of the monkeys by itself is finite; it is only the number of monkeys that that usage takes to be infinite. In another sense, the latter usage is also incorrect since just one monkey suffices; there is no need for infinitely many.
In Inflexible Logic by Russell Maloney, a short story that appeared in the New Yorker in 1940, the protagonist felt that his wealth put him under an obligation to support the sciences, and so he tested that theory. (He had heard the British-Museum version.) His monkeys immediately set to work typing classics of fiction and nonfiction. The rich man was amused to see unexpurgated versions of Samuel Pepys' diaries, of which he owned only copies of bowdlerized editions.
Gian-Carlo Rota wrote in a textbook on probability (unfinished when he died):
Popular culture references to this theorem include The Simpsons (in one episode, Montgomery Burns has his own room full of dactylographic monkeys, one of which is chastised for mistyping a word in the opening sentence of A Tale of Two Cities) and The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent, under the influence of a device that makes highly improbable events occur, are ambushed by an infinite number of monkeys who want their opinion on the monkeys' script for Hamlet).
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|