Encyclopedia > Criminal intent

  Article Content

Mens rea

Redirected from Criminal intent

Mens rea (from Latin, "bad mind") is the mental state that, in combination with the actus reus ("bad act"), produces criminal liability. According to Western jurisprudence, there must be a concurrence of both actus reus and mens rea for a crime to have been committed. As it is impossible to know what a defendant actually thought at the time of his criminal act, mens rea is often inferred from the circumstances. Mens rea is not the same thing as motive[?]. Crimes of strict liability, such as traffic offenses, involve the mens rea of strict liability, which does not require any criminal intent (see Common Law below).

The Model Penal Code[?], a publication of the American Law Institute, defines mens rea in particularly clear terms and has been adopted by much of the United States:

  • Purpose: the actor's conscious object is to commit the proscribed act.
  • Knowledge: the actor knows that the proscribed act will certainly occur as a result of his actions.
  • Recklessness: the actor is aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the proscribed act will occur as a result of his actions.
  • Negligence: the actor reasonably should know that the proscribed act will occur as a result of his actions.

Contrast these four categories with the Common Law mens rea definitions:

  • Specific Intent: the actor intends to commit the proscribed act. E.g. premeditated murder. Roughly equivalent to the Purpose and Knowledge standards of the Model Penal Code.
  • General Intent: the actor intends a bad act, but not necessarily the act that is subsequently committed. Roughly equivalent to the Recklessness and Negligence standards of the Model Penal Code.
  • Strict Liability: the actor has no intent to commit any offense but is held liable nonetheless. (The Model Penal Code does not recognize strict liability as a mens rea for which imprisonment is appropriate.)

A concept that is somewhat misleading for its over-simplification is so-called presumed knowledge of the law. A more appropriate saying is that generally, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. No one is "presumed" to know the law; the reality is that knowledge of the particular statute prohibiting certain conduct is not usually an element of the crime created by that statute, and therefore knowledge of the law is not required for punishment.

Examples of mens rea in statutes

Model Penal Code: A person commits murder if he (1) purposely or knowingly (2) causes the death of a human being.

Common Law: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to cause the death of a human being with malice aforethought. (b) A violation of this section is murder in the second degree.

See also: actus reus, manslaughter, animus nocendi, voluntas necandi[?]

See generally: Criminal law



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
Sanskrit language

... root of all later Indo-European languages. Vedic Sanskrit is also practically identical to Avestan, the language of Zoroastrianism. After the consolidation of its grammar ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 49 ms