in general, is an organized register of some set of objects (for example, books, works of art, coins, car parts).
A library catalog is a register of all bibliographic items found in a library. A bibliographic item is a library material[?] (for example, a book), a part of a library material (for example, a single novel in an anthology), or a group of library materials (for example, a trilogy), as far as it is relevant to the catalog.
A library catalog typically serves to answer part of the following questions:
- Does the library have a specific library material (of which I can provide all information needed to identify the material)?
- Which works by some author does the library have?
- Which works about some subject does the library have?
- Which works have been written by some author?
- Which works about some subject have been published?
Questions 4 and 5 are actually questions answered by bibliographies
, but some large libraries possess almost all publications of some period, or some country, and their catalog also serves as bibliography for these categories.
In addition, a catalog may serve internal purposes of the library, for example as an inventory of everything that should be present.
Traditionally, there are the following types of catalog:
- Author catalog: a formal catalog, sorted alphabetically according to the authors' or editors' names of the entries.
- Title catalog: a formal catalog, sorted alphabetically according to the title of the entries.
- Keyword catalog: a subject catalog, sorted alphabetically according to some system of keywords.
- Mixed alphabetic catalog forms: sometimes, one finds a mixed author / title, or an author / title / keyword catalog.
- Systematic catalog: a subject catalog, sorted according to some systematic subdivision of subjects.
- Shelf list catalog: a formal catalog with entries sorted in the same order as bibliographic items are shelved.
Producing formal catalogs is relatively easy, as the cataloger can follow a strict set of catalog rules. However, a formal catalog cannot answer question 3 (which works about some subject does the library have?). A subject catalog just serves that goal, but it is much more difficult to produce, as the cataloguer has to get an accurate impression of the contents of the bibliographic item.
Catalog rules have been defined to allow for consistent cataloguing of various library materials across several persons of a cataloguing team and across time. Users can use them to get a more clear idea about how to find an entry and how to interpret the data in an entry. Catalog rules prescribe
- which information from a bibliographic item is included in the entry;
- how this information is presented on a catalog card;
- how the entries have to be sorted in the catalog.
The larger a collection, the more elaborate catalog rules are needed. Users cannot and want not examine hundreds of catalog entries or even dozens of library materials to find the one item they need.
Currently, most catalog rules are similar to, or even based on, the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), a set of rules produced by the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) to describe a wide range of library materials. These rules organize the bibliographic description of an item in the following areas: title and statement of responsibility (author or editor), edition, material-dependent information (for example, the scale of a map), publication and distribution, physical description (for example, number of pages), series, note, and standard number (ISBN).
Library items that are (mainly) written in a foreign script are, in most cases, transliterated to the script of the catalog.
In a title catalog, one can distinguish two sort orders:
- In the grammatic sort order (used mainly in older catalogs), the most important word of the title is the first sort term. The importance of a word is measured by grammatic rules; for example, the first noun may be defined to be the most important word.
- In the mechanic sort order, the first word of the title is the first sort term. Most new catalogs use this scheme, but still include a trace of the grammatic sort order: they neglect an article at the beginning of the title.
The grammatic sort order has the advantage that often, the most important word of the title is also a good keyword (question 3), and it is the word most users remember first when their memory is incomplete. However, it has the disadvantage that many elaborate grammatic rules are needed, so that only expert users may be able to search the catalog without help from a librarian.
In some catalogs, person's names are standardized, i. e., the name of the person is always (catalogued and) sorted in a standard form, even if it appears differently in the library material. An advantage of the standardization is that it is easier to answer question 2 (which works of some author does the library have?). On the other hand, it becomes more difficult to answer question 1 (does the library have some specific material?) if the material spells the author in a peculiar variant. For the cataloguer, it may incur (too) much work to check whether Smith, J. is Smith, John or Smith, Jack.
For some works, even the title can be standardized. For example, translations and reeditions are sometimes sorted under their original title. In many catalogs, parts of the Bible are sorted under the standard name of the book(s) they contain.
Many detail questions about alphabetic sorting of entries arise. Some examples:
- Some languages know sorting conventions that differ from the language of the catalog. For example, some Dutch catalogs sort IJ as Y. Should an English catalog follow this suit? And should a Dutch catalog sort non-Dutch words the same way?
- Some titles contain numbers, for example Orwell's 1984. How to sort them? (Often, it is decided to sort it as Nineteenhundred eighty-four.)
- de Balzac, Honoré or Balzac, Honoré de? Ortega y Gasset, Jesus[?] or Gasset, Jesus Ortega y?
In a subject catalog,
one has to decide on which classification to use.
On-line cataloging has greatly enhanced the usability of catalogs.
- The on-line catalog does not need to be sorted statically; the user can choose author, title, keyword, or systematic order dynamically.
- Most on-line catalogs offer a search facility for any word of the title; the goal of the grammatic word order (provide an entry on the word that most users would look for) is reached even better.
- Many on-line catalogs allow links between several variants of an author name. So, authors can be found both under the original and the standardised name (if entered properly by the cataloger).
All Wikipedia text
is available under the
terms of the GNU Free Documentation License