It was part of a series of three definitive stamps issued in that year and was intended for use on local newspapers. The other two stamps, a 4¢ magenta and 4¢ blue, were intended for postage.
The issue came through mischance. An anticipated arrival of local stamps never arrived by ship in 1856, so the local postmaster, E.T.E Dalton, authorised a printer, Joseph Baum and William Dallas, who were the publishers of the Official Gazette newspaper in Georgetown, to print out an emergency issue of three stamps. Dalton gave some specifications about the design, but the printer chose to add a boat that was of his own design on the stamp series. Dalton was not pleased with the end result, and as a safeguard against forgery ordered that all correspondence bearing the stamps be autographed by the post office clerks.
Only one copy of the 1¢ stamp is known to exist. It is in used condition and has been cut in an octagonal[?] shape. A signature, in accordance to Dalton's policy, can be seen on the left hand side. Although dirty and heavily postmarked on the upper left hand side, it is nonetheless regarded as priceless.
It was discovered in 1873, by 12-year-old Scottish schoolboy Vernon Vaughan in the Guianan town of Demerara[?], amongst his uncle's letters. There was no record of it in his stamp catalogue, so he sold it to a collector some weeks later for six shillings. After that, the price escalated. It was purchased by Ferrary in the 1880s for US$750. Arthur Hind[?] bought it at a Ferrary auction in 1922 for over US$30,000 (outbidding King George V among others), and it changed hands in 1970 for $280,000. John E. duPont[?] bought it for $935,000 in 1980, and it is reportedly locked away in a vault while its owner is serving a 30-year sentence for murder.
Controversies
An unsubstantiated rumour developed in the 1920s that a second copy of the stamp had been discovered , and that the then owner of the stamp, Arthur Hind, quietly purchased this second copy and destroyed it.
At one point, controversy broke when it was suggested that the 1¢ stamp was a "doctored" copy of the magenta 4¢ stamp of the 1856 series, which was very similar to the 1¢ stamp in appearance. These claims were disproven.
In 1999, controversy again broke out over the possibility of a second 1c stamp being discovered in Bremen, Germany. This was twice examined and found to be a fake by the London-based Royal Philatelic Society[?]. This specimen had in fact been an altered 4¢ magenta stamp.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|