Encyclopedia > Affirming the antecedent

  Article Content

Affirming the antecedent

Affirming the antecedent is an argument form which proceeds by affirming the truth of the first part (the "if" part, commonly called the antecedent) of a conditional, and concluding that the second part (the "then" part, commonly called the consequent) is true.

If P, then Q.
P.
Therefore, Q.

Many people assume that this works the other way as well, so that one could say:

If P then Q.
Q.
Therefore P.

But this is a Logical fallacy called Affirming the consequent. Since P entails Q, but Q does not necessarily entail P. You can see this if we simply substitute in actuall statements for P. and Q.

If there is fire here, then there is oxygen here.
There is oxygen here.
Therefore, there is fire here.

Sometimes P and Q entail each other, in that case we can say P if and only if Q. (Sometimes the shorthand P iff Q is used rather than writing out if and only if).



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
North Lindenhurst, New York

... Pacific Islander, 3.49% from other races, and 1.95% from two or more races. 11.66% of the population are Hispanic or Latino of any race. There are 3,808 households out of ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 34.3 ms