A normal rocket engine uses a large "engine bell" to direct the jet of exhaust from the engine from the surrounding airflow and maximize its acceleration – and thus the thrust. However the proper design of the bell varies with external conditions, one that is designed to operate at high altitudes where the air pressure is lower needs to be much larger and more tapered than one designed for low altitudes. The losses of using the wrong design can be significant, for instance the Space Shuttle engine can generate a specific impulse of just over 450 seconds in space, but that number falls to just over 360 at sea level. Tuning the bell to the average environment in which the engine will operate is an important task in any rocket design.
The aerospike attempts to avoid this problem. Instead of firing the exhaust out a small hole in the middle of a bell, it instead exits on one side of a cone-shaped protrusion, the "spike". The spike forms one side of a "virtual bell", with the other side being formed by the airflow past the spacecraft – thus the aero-spike.
Several versions of the design exist, differentiated by their shape. In the toroidal aerospike the spike is bowl-shaped with the exhaust existing in a ring around the outer rim. In theory this requires an infinitely long spike for best efficiency, but by blowing a small amount of gas out the center of a shorter truncated spike, you can achieve something fairly similar. In the linear aerospike the spike consists of a tapered wedge-shaped plate, with exhaust exiting on either side at the "thick" end. This design has the advantage of being stackable, allowing several engines to be placed in a row to make one larger engine.
The "trick" to the aerospike design is that as the spacecraft climbs to higher altitudes, the air pressure holding the exhaust against the spike decreases. This allows the exhaust to move further from the spike, and the virtual bell automatically expands in just the right way. In theory the areospike is slightly less efficient than bell designed for any given altitude, yet it vastly outperforms that same bell at all other altitudes. The difference can be considerable, with typical designs claiming over 90% efficiency at all altitudes.
Numbers like these are hard to argue with, and Rocketdyne[?] conducted a lengthy series of tests in the 1960s on various designs. Later models of these engines were based on their highly reliable J-2[?] engine machinery and provided the same sort of thrust levels as the conventional engines they were based on; 200,000lbs in the J-2T-200k, and 250,000 in the J-2T-250k (the T refers to the toroidal combustion chamber). Thirty years later their work was dusted off again for use in NASAs X-33[?] project. In this case the slightly upgraded J-2S engine mechinery was used with a linear spike, creating the RS-2200. After more development and considerably testing, this project was cancelled when the X-33 encountered massive cost overruns.
So none of these designs were ever flown, and the actual performance at altitude remains something of a mystery (and sometimes hotly debated). In today's space launch market it appears unlikely that the designs will be developed.
See also:
External links:
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|