Encyclopedia > Wikipedia:Dirty laundry

  Article Content

Wikipedia:Dirty laundry

This is a policy-to-be page that really is part of the NPOV policy- These issues are balance -related - see Wikipedia:Abundance and redundancy. The exclusion of material is not desired, but also the inclusion of peripheral material, to the imbalance of the article is also undesireable.


Wikipedia needs a policy on dirty laundry. YOU can help formulate this policy.

Should we mention the youthful indiscretions of famous people, or not? How about not-so-youthful indiscretions?


My POV on this: Richard Wagner held contemptible views, and appears to have been an obnoxious person. At the same time, he wrote remarkable music. We should only report facts (when there is consensus) and opinions (where there is controversy). Wagner's views are a matter of record, their obnoxiousness an almost universal opinion about those views. Similiarly with the fact of his composition of his works, and the almost universal opinion that they are great works of music. All of these are significant facts and opinions about Wagner, and thus fitting encylopedia material.

Similar reasoning applies to the other cases: just report the facts and opinions.

The Anome



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
List of intelligence agencies

... General de la Defense Nationale[?] (SGDN) Germany Bundesnachrichtendienst[?] (BND) Nazi Germany Abwehr, WW2 Gestapo Sicherheitsdienst (SD; ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 40.6 ms