Should we mention the youthful indiscretions of famous people, or not? How about not-so-youthful indiscretions?
My POV on this: Richard Wagner held contemptible views, and appears to have been an obnoxious person. At the same time, he wrote remarkable music. We should only report facts (when there is consensus) and opinions (where there is controversy). Wagner's views are a matter of record, their obnoxiousness an almost universal opinion about those views. Similiarly with the fact of his composition of his works, and the almost universal opinion that they are great works of music. All of these are significant facts and opinions about Wagner, and thus fitting encylopedia material.
Similar reasoning applies to the other cases: just report the facts and opinions.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|