A: Because it's full of simple poles.
These are partially or wholly my fault: riemann integral lebesgue integration numerical integration integral aliasing anti-aliasing collision detection Riemann surface. I also originally put in dadaism; the article read "see redundant[?]" and under redundant[?] I had also written "see redundant[?]" but I don't think that's survived. In fact, I think it only survived about 5 minutes, because I remember seeing an actual definition of dadaism under that article about 5 minutes after I executed my cunning plan. In a way, I think that was the best description of dadaism. I also, very early on in wikipedia history, created a pile of dung flavored pages about analysis, but they were much improved upon and rewritten (I suspect by Axel.) This is a list of articles for which I suspect I wrote a substantial amount of text, but if I did it was about two years ago, and I don't remember. mathematics functional analysis harmonic analysis Finite element method
I've also contributed useless short articles here and there.
http://www.math.mcgill.ca/loisel/
Don't use the "email this user." That's my spam email. I don't read it.
Search Encyclopedia
|