In the original Bannerman book, the setting was clearly India, but the illustrations of the boy were pretty clearly African, not Indian. It is quite likely that the Scottish author simply didn't know the difference or didn't care. American readers clearly assumed that the boy was African (they too were probably ignorant of the distinction), and the book published here was Bannerman's original with the same illustrations. "Babaji" is indeed very recent. --LDC
Maybe someone who knows clothing styles can settle the issue...are the later Sambo illustrations (1960s or 1970s) drawings of an Indian or an African boy? - firepink
I think the seriously stereotypical version was one that came out in the 1940s -- Sambo is a nappy headed (not in the British sense, but in the Stevie Wonder sense) little African child.
Strangely, the parts about the story that stuck with me were the picture of the butter around the base of the tree the one of the very handsome tiger wearing the shoes with crimson soles and crimson linings on his ears... JHK
I deleted the note that Bannerman's story is banned because it needs more details. Who banned it where? Tuf-Kat
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|