The text I copied from
tensor said:
both raised and lowered on the same side. When I did Lagrangian mechanics, it was twice on the same side, which allow dot and cross products to be written in this way --
Tarquin 20:13 Mar 13, 2003 (UTC)
- In general, either are used but in several fields (i.e. spacetime geometry) the up/down is required and correspond to a 'tensor contraction'. -- looxix 20:36 Mar 13, 2003 (UTC)
Can we add this funny Einstein's comment stolen from Wolfram:
- The convention was introduced by Einstein (1916, sec. 5), who later jested to a friend, "I have made a great discovery in mathematics; I have suppressed the summation sign every time that the summation must be made over an index which occurs twice..." (Kollros 1956; Pais 1982, p. 216).
- -- looxix 00:14 Mar 14, 2003 (UTC)
Don't see why not -- Tarquin 11:40 Mar 14, 2003 (UTC)
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinSummation
I will write the next section, but not until tomorrow at least.
I may not be up to the last section, however.
Both of these are briefly described in Appendix 3 of Wald's 1994 QFT in CS & BHT book.
So you can look there if you want to write them! ^_^
-- Toby 07:16 Mar 18, 2003 (UTC)
IE6 does not show ⊗ (& otimes;) - Patrick 11:00 Mar 18, 2003 (UTC)
I try to explain in the surrounding context what the missing symbol would be when I do something like this.
But there are alternatives short of going to full-blown texvc.
Can you give some advice for your browser:
- V ⊗ W (relying on context to know what the box represents);
- V (x) W (long used by mathematicians in ASCII contexts like Usenet);
- V x W (relying on context to know what kind of multiplication is involved);
- V W (a less distorted picture than that produced by texvc).
--
Toby 00:05 Mar 20, 2003 (UTC)
The box is not clear, the same one appears for every symbol that can not be represented. #3 and #4 both are fine. - Patrick 01:06 Mar 20, 2003 (UTC)
All Wikipedia text
is available under the
terms of the GNU Free Documentation License