Encyclopedia > Talk:Ebola virus

  Article Content

Talk:Ebola virus

I merged the EHF article with this but I'm not sure it was the right thing. Is it not better to have seperate, linked articles, one on the disease the other on the virus rather than one merged article. This was demonstrated by the original opening article line "the Ebola virus is a severe, often fatal disease...", no it isn't - it is a virus, it causes a disease.
I only thought it was unnecessary to have two articles, one about the disease and one about the virus. Probably, the article better goes to Ebola haemorrhagic fever, but with the image and the info from the virus page. Also, the Ebola Zaire and Ebola Sudan could be merged there as well; no need to say the same thing over and again, right? Ebola virus,Ebola Zaire and Ebola Sudan could then redirect to Ebola haemorrhagic fever. What do you think? --Magnus Manske, Monday, June 17, 2002

Certainly Ebola Sudan and Zaire should be redirects. I would prefer the information to be under EHF. Unless there are any objections I'll do the moves.

Moved!



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
Brazil

... and he also appoints the cabinet. The Brazilian parliament, the bicameral National Congress or Congresso Nacional, consists of the Federal Senate or Senado Federal ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 23.7 ms