The page should start with definition equations for the various key parameters (eg. velocity, acceleration, force, work, kinetic energy, momentum, angular momentum, etc...). This section could then be followed by a listing of other useful equations, like x=1/2at2+v0t+x0. What do you think?
--Matt Stoker
Thanks for the praise. The "Equations..." page sounds like a really good idea - GWO
Personally, I would prefer defining force at least initially as, F = m*a, however, if the consensus is that F=d(m*v)/dt is more precise,
would it be preferable to first define momentum as p=m*v and then define force as F=dp/dt?
--Matt Stoker
Yes, it would be better. That way you can keep the same definition of force in relativity.
Could be. Weigh up the addition of some more notation, with the simplification of some of the equations. Would it obscure the logical flow behind F=d(m*v)/dt=m*dv/dt=m*a ? I guess the notation thing is the age-old problem of mathematical writingGWO
Moved the request: Someone please add the equations for gravitational, electric, and magnetic forces
to this page, and responding. Gravitational may be appropriate, but electrical and magnetic force definitions belong with articles on electricity and magnetism (believe me, they're another whole ball game).
Final note: physicists divide physics in to classical and quantum mechanics. Einstein's relativity is actually lumped in with classical.
I've gutted the article and re-written major parts of it. It's still far from complete, but I'm structuring it after quantum mechanics, which I think has a very nice layout. Some of the removed material probably ought to be stuck back in, either here or in a separate article.
Comments are welcome. Hope I haven't ruffled any feathers :-P
Some changes, with reasons:
Ultimately, I think we'll want to have links to the important sub-topics of classical mechanics: composite objects, inertial and non-inertial reference frames, oscillations, and so forth. -- CYD
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|