Super ellipse

A super ellipse is a geometrical figure which in a cartesian coordinate system can be described as the set of all points (x, y) with

|x/a|ⁿ + |y/b|ⁿ = 1

where n > 0 and a and b are the radii of the oval shape. The case n = 2 yields an ordinary ellipse; increasing n beyond 2 yields the hyperellipses which increasingly resemble rectangles; decreasing n below 2 yields hypoellipses which develop pointy corners in the x and y directions and increasingly resemble a cross.

The super ellipse can be described parametrically as:

x(θ) = ±a cos^2/n(θ)

y(θ) = ±b sin^2/n(θ)

(0 ≤ θ < π/2).

The super ellipse is generalized as:

|x/a|^m + |y/b|ⁿ = 1, (m,n > 0).

Though often credited with its invention, Piet Hein did not discover the super-ellipse. The general cartesian notation of the form comes from the French mathematician Gabriel Lamé who generalized the equation for the ellipse.

However Piet Hein did popularize the use of the super-ellipse in architecture, urban planning and furniture making, and he did invent the super-egg or super-ellipsoid by starting with the super-ellipse

|x/4|^2.5 + |y/3|^2.5 = 1

and revolving it about the x-axis. Unlike a regular ellipsoid, the super-ellipsoid can stand upright on a flat surface.

City planners in Stockholm, Sweden needed a solution for a roundabout in their old city square Sergels Torg (http://www.sbk.stockholm.se/SergelT/Index.htm). Piet Hein's super-ellipse provided the needed aesthetic and practical solution. In 1969, negotiators in Paris for the Vietnam War could not agree on the shape of the negotiating table. Piet Hein designed a huge super-ellipse shaped table which accommodated all parties. The super-ellipse was used for the shape of the 1968 Azteca Olympic Stadium [1] (http://www.mexico-city-mexico.com), [2] (http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_pictures/north_america/mexico/mexico_city_azteca.shtml) in Mexico City.

Man is the animal that draws lines which he himself then stumbles over. In the whole pattern of civilization there have been two tendencies, one toward straight lines and rectangular patterns and one toward circular lines. There are reasons, mechanical and psychological, for both tendencies. Things made with straight lines fit well together and save space. And we can move easily -- physically or mentally -- around things made with round lines. But we are in a straitjacket, having to accept one or the other, when often some intermediate form would be better. To draw something freehand -- such as the patchwork traffic circle they tried in Stockholm -- will not do. It isn't fixed, isn't definite like a circle or square. You don't know what it is. It isn't esthetically satisfying. The super-ellipse solved the problem. It is neither round nor rectangular, but in between. Yet it is fixed, it is definite -- it has a unity. -- Piet Hein