Encyclopedia > Oregon Ballot Measure 9 (1992)

  Article Content

Oregon Ballot Measure 9 (1992)

One of Oregon's most famous ballot measures, Ballot Measure 9 of 1992 would have added the following to Oregon's state constitution: "All governments in Oregon may not use their monies or properties to promote, encourage or facilitate homosexuality, pedophilia, sadism or masochism. All levels of government, including public education[?] systems, must assist in setting a standard for Oregon's youth which recognizes that these behaviors are abnormal, wrong, unnatural and perverse and they are to be discouraged and avoided."[1] (http://www.wweek.com/html/25-1992) It was defeated in the November 3, 1992 general election with 638,527 votes in favor, 828,290 votes against.[2] (http://bluebook.state.or.us/state/elections/elections21.htm)

The ballot measure was the effort of the Oregon Citizens Alliance[?], a conservative group active in Oregon politics in the 1990s. Supporters of the measure felt that their traditional values were under seige in the face of growing acceptance of homosexuality by society. Opponents felt the measure was unfairly discriminatory, and that it demonstrated the homophobia and bigotry of its backers.

Although the measure failed, its legacy can still be seen today. The Oregon Citizens Alliance went on to introduce a series of watered-down ballot measures along the same lines as Measure 9 (most of which failed). On the other hand, opposition to Ballot Measure 9 formed the basis of much of the current gay rights movment in Oregon, including the organization Basic Rights Oregon[?].[3] (http://www.wweek.com/html/25-1992)

See also: List of Oregon ballot measures

External links



All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 
  Search Encyclopedia

Search over one million articles, find something about almost anything!
 
 
  
  Featured Article
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

... which values individual rights. Members of Parliament saw the movement to entrench a charter as contrary to the British model of Parliamentary supremacy. Ironically, ...

 
 
 
This page was created in 28 ms