Proponents of the measure argued that "Oregonians should have the right to know what they are eating." They repeated the belief of some activists that genetic engineering of food poses a potential threat to health and safety. (See frankenfood.) Proponents also ridiculed the cost estimates of the law brought by the measure's opponents.[2] (http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov52002/guide/measures/m27fav.htm) Proponents hoped that an Oregon labelling law would spark debate about the use of GMOs in food and eventually a nationwide labelling system.
Opponents aruged that Oregon's agricultural industry would be burdened by excessive costs if the measure were to pass, given the lack of such a requirement throughout the rest of the United States. In addition, opponents noted the lack of evidence that GMO foods posed a danger to human health.[3] (http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov52002/guide/measures/m27opp.htm) Monsanto, an agricultrual company whose products comprise 70% of the GMO market, donated $1.5 million to the effort against the measure.[4] (http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/opb/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=412541)
See also: List of Oregon ballot measures
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|