Main differences to current economic systems:
Freiwirtschaft does not aim to replace a social state or ecological politics, but would facilitate these.
There seems to be an attempt to realize Freiwirtschaft in a small area in Canada, based on artificial money called Gogo[?] that loses its value after one year.
This is not the case on the finance market. Without the continuous increase of the amount of money in circulation by the central bank, the demand would continuously drop, since the cirtulation speed decreases. Dropping demand forces companies to lower their prices to make some money at all. When prices start dropping, potential customers wait with their buy as long as possible to get the lowest price, resulting in the demand decreasing even more. The feedback loop spirals down to a point where the company does not make any money at all. That, eventually, results in layoffs and even the bankruptcy of the company. Workers in other companies tend to be even more cautious in spending money, ultimately resulting in the breakdown of the economy.
The key error of the system is the ill-transported information in the price. Money is nothing but claim for goods and services from the economy that accepts the money. In a weak economy, money is worth less in goods. But instead of an inflation, the result is a deflation as described above, and less money can now buy the same goods. The market players do not realize that they are destroying the very economy that should ensure the value of the money. This feedback loop is self-destabelizing. According to Freiwirtschaft theory, this is the reason for the cycle of crisis in world economy.
For a theoretical example of Freiwirtschaft , see [1] (http://www.systemfehler.de/kartoffel/giralkartoffeln.htm) (in German).
For an English version of Silvio Gesell's major book on the issue see The Natural Economic Order (http://www.systemfehler.de/en/neo/)
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|