These words first appeared in the original paper "Some Limits to Global Ecophagy by Biovorous Nanoreplicators, with Public Policy Recommendations" published in April 2000 by Freitas, where he wrote: "Perhaps the earliest-recognized and best-known danger of molecular nanotechnology is the risk that self-replicating nanorobots capable of functioning autonomously in the natural environment could quickly convert that natural environment (e.g., 'biomass') into replicas of themselves (e.g., 'nanomass') on a global basis, a scenario usually referred to as the 'grey goo problem' but perhaps more properly termed 'global ecophagy'."
Some typical usages of the term:
"Nanotechnologists have similarly recognized that out-of-control nanobots could destroy the biosphere; a first quantitative study of this possibility of "global ecophagy"; by Robert Freitas was recently published in response to the article I wrote on this subject in Wired in April [2000]. His study is quite troubling, showing the clear dangers we face from unrestricted nanotechnology and the extreme difficulty and enormous scale required of any 'defense'." (Bill Joy, "Genetics, nanotechnology, robotics pose danger to society," The Sunday Patriot-News Harrisburg, 23 July 2000.)
"As far as I know, this article by Mr. Freitas was the first detailed, published analysis of the so-called 'gray goo' problem." (Bill Joy, The Sciences 40:3 (November/December 2000))
"They call it 'global ecophagy'. That's 'eating the Earth' to you and me. Rumour has it that this is what replicating nanostructures might do, and according to one estimate, they could gobble up the entire planet in about three hours flat." (Philip Ball, "The Robot Within," New Scientist, 15 March 2003.)
See also gray goo (described by K. Eric Drexler in his book Engines of Creation[?]).
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|