Jensen was condemned as racist in the late 1960s by a generation of academics in a state of reaction against the racist atrocities of the Second World War. In one article, Jensen argued that his claims had been misunderstood:
Nevertheless, eugenicists and others point to passages such as the following (from his book The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability) to support their claim that Jensen has proven that differences in IQ scores between races is mostly genetic:
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, known for his popularizations of science in mass market books and magazines, attacked Jensen's work in his 1981 book The Mismeasure of Man.
Gould makes three criticisms. The first is also the criticism most commonly leveled against Jensen by other anthropologists and biologists: that Jensen misunderstands the concept of "heritability." Heritability measures the percentage of variation of a trait due to inheritance, within a population. Jensen, however, has used the concept of heritability to measure differences in iheritance between populations (Gould 1981: 127; 156-156).
The second criticism is relatively minor: Gould disagrees with Jensen's support of the attempts of others to calculate the IQ of dead people (such as the famous Polish astronomer and Prussian monetary theorist Copernicus) (1981: 153-154).
The third criticism is significant: Gould disagrees with Jensen's belief that IQ tests measure a real variable called "g" or "the general factor common to a large number of cognitive abilities" which can be measured along a unilinear scale. This is a claim most closely identified with Cyril Burt and Charles Spearman. According to Gould, Jensen misunderstood the research of L.L. Thurstone to ultimately support this claim; Gould however argues that Thurstone's factoral analysis of intelligence revealed "g" to be an illusion (1981: 159; 13-314).
In a 1982 review of Gould's book Jensen gives strong point by point answers to Gould's characterizations of his work, including Gould's treatment of heritability, the "reification" of "g" and the use of Thurstone's analysis (see [1] (http://www.wcotc.com/euvolution/articles/gould01) or [2] (http://www.debunker.com/texts/jensen)). Gould made no further response.
See also: the discussion of race and intelligence.
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|