In ancient near-Eastern and Middle Eastern law, such as Babylonian law, the concept of lex talionis, "an eye for eye, a tooth for a tooth" stood as a centerpiece of retributive justice.
In societies not bound by the rule of law, if a person was hurt, then the hurt person (or their relative) would take vengeful retribution on the person who caused the pain. Often the retibution would be much more than the crime; it often was death. Babylonian law put a limit on such actions, restricting the retribution to be no more than that crime.
In the Hebrew Bible, God issues many denunciations of of ancient near-Eastern morality and law; the Torah (Exodus 21:24) offers its own statement of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth". Read in its historical context, we note that the Torah is not encouraging retributive justice at all; rather it is setting forth a commandment that all legal punishments must be no more worse than the crime, and gives the example of "an eye for eye, or a tooth for a tooth". This is meant to serve as a limitation on what kind of response the injured party could give.
The oral law of Judaism holds that this verse was, from the beginning, never meant to be followed literally. The rabbis of the Mishnah and Talmud ask "How can any person be certain that the punishment they inflict is definitely no worse than the initial injury?" They answer that this is impossible to carry out in practice. Therefore, they conclude that to follow the spirit of this law, it must be interpreted as applying to financial damages that are commesurate with the severity of the crime.
Most Christians see the New Testament as superior to the Hebrew Bible, and have traditionally read many of the laws in the Hebrew Bible as outdated or immoral. Outside of the Jewish community, the Christian view of the Hebrew Bible has become standard for many non-Christians. As such, many non-Christians have a critical view of the Hebrew Bible's conception of justice, and also of rabbinic Judaism's concept of justice. One example of this point of view is the quote "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind" by Mohandas Gandhi.
Those who disagree with this view note that it is a Christian interpretation of the commandment, which assumes that the directive encourages bloody retributive justice. Since the original intent was to limit retribution, the criticism is held to be misinformed and invalid.
Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations explanation of the Torah and Lex Talonis (http://www.ou.org/about/judaism/torah.htm)
Search Encyclopedia
|
Featured Article
|